miércoles, 25 de marzo de 2009

Usa protector solar !!!

Esta frase no dice mucho. Es un consejo simplemente; pero los consejos tienen la virtud de poder ser aceptados o rechazados sin ningun problema. Porque para eso son. Eso lo aprendimos en Foro Europeo.

Este video nos aconseja eso: Usar portector solar!!!

Pero ademas de darnos este consejo tan evidente, nos da unas simples, pero grandes lecciones sobre la vida; y lo hace simplemente a traves de otros consejos, incluso mas obvios que este. No crean que por ser obvios van a ser faciles de aplicar; muchos de los que en el video se mencionan, son tan pasados por alto a diario, que cuesta mucho trabajo comenzar a aplicarlos.

Disfrutenlo cuando lo vean, pero les aseguramos que si lo ven completo una vez, lo veran dos y hasta tres.


domingo, 22 de marzo de 2009

Consejo Esencial Para Cualquier Equipo Directivo

Esta vez queremos compartirles unos videos del senor Jose Maria Cardona Labarga quien nos expone un seminario llamado ''Consejo Esencial Para Cualquier Equipo Directivo'' con el fin de obtener consejos de un experto para el desarrollo directivo.

Este es el link de una de las siete partes en que se divide su seminario.

Liderazgo y Magnament Practico 1- Consejo Directivo


Breve biografia del expositor:

Doctor Ingeniero del ICAI (Universidad Pontificia de Comillas), Graduado en Ciencias Empresariales ICADE (U.P.C.), ex-Profesor de Estructura Económica, de Contabilidad Financiera y de Estrategia Empresarial. Ha sido Jefe de Proyectos, Director de Fábrica, Director Financiero y Director General en distintas empresas.Hace 25 años creó su propia empresa consultora, en la que viene trabajando en Formación y Desarrollo de Comités de Dirección. Autor de 10 libros sobre distintos temas empresariales; en el último “Los 8 hábitos del Líder” resume su modelo sobre cómo gestionar la empresa para lograr resultados.

Tiene su propio plan de estudio sobre antropología de la función directiva y análisis de las actuales tendencias que gravitan sobre la empresa.

lunes, 16 de marzo de 2009

7 Tips for Difficult Conversations





I have to tell one of my long-standing suppliers that we're cutting back orders 50%. We're their biggest client -- and I know it will be devastating.


The new hire worked all night on the presentation, but there were big mistakes in it, and I've got to tell her before she makes them again.


There's no way we're going to meet the deadline for producing the report our boss promised the Board -- we just don't have the data yet. Someone has to talk to him before this whole situation blows up.


There are certain conversations all leaders dread: the ones in which we have to deliver bad news, discuss a sensitive or "political" subject, or talk about a project or meeting that's gone wrong.



The mere thought of having these difficult conversations fills you with anxiety, and distracts you from other work. You don't want to play the bad guy, and or have the situation to blow up in your face. As much as it's tempting, you don't want to just avoid the whole mess, either. You want to take charge and talk about it - effectively. But how?One of the best business books I've ever read is Difficult Conversations by Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, and Sheila Heen. It's a short, practical guide on how to talk about "what matters most" -- even when the subject is really, really uncomfortable. In this crazy business environment, when you're having more difficult conversations than ever before, the tools the book offers are indispensible.


Here are some of my favorite, action-oriented tips:




  1. Keep your goals realistic. You can't ever eliminate the stress you'll feel around telling your supplier you're cutting back, but you can reduce it. Spend your energy on preparation - focus on developing your specific script.


  2. Give bad news upfront. Tough messages should be simply and clearly stated in the first sentence.


  3. Adopt the "And Stance". Take control of the conversation by pre-empting distractions, objections and blame by using "and". "I know you worked all night, and I know you want to do well, and I know you just joined the company, and I know the graphics people sometimes get the data wrong, and I know I could have been clearer in my directions to you...." And, and, and.


  4. Get out of the "blame frame." Each person involved in the situation has a different objective story about what happened. Your goal is not to judge who's right and wrong, it's to manage to better outcomes in the future.


  5. Paraphrase. To create clarity and to let people know you're genuinely listening, summarize what they're telling you -- and ask them to do the same.


  6. Be prepared for bad reactions. Finger-pointing, denial, arguments and tears are all possible outcomes of tough conversations. You cannot control the other person's reactions, but you can anticipate them, and be emotionally ready.


  7. Pretend it's 3 months or 10 years from now. Put the difficult conversation in perspective by thinking about the future. The conversations that are hardest right now will seem less daunting. What kind of difficult conversations are you grappling with - and how are you dealing with them successfully?

domingo, 15 de marzo de 2009

Videos de Interes

Saliéndonos un poco de lo académico, hemos decidido comenzar una búsqueda de material audiovisual adicional. Es simplemente una sugerencia sobre algunos videos que nos parecen interesantes para compartir con todos ustedes.

Estos dos videos consisten en un discurso que ofreció Steve Jobs (Steven Paul Jobs). Es cofundador, Chairman y CEO de Apple Inc., fue también CEO de Pixar Animation Studios, además de ser su principal accionista; fundo también Next. Esto es una pequeña reseña de quien es este señor, si quieren conocerlo mas, en Wikipedia encuentran una reseña mas detallada.

Steve Jobs 1º Parte Discurso con Subtítulos en Español

Steve Jobs 2º Parte Discurso con Subtítulos en Español

martes, 10 de marzo de 2009

Yo sé, tu sabes, el sabe, nosotros sabemos ....


Navegando por internet, encontramos este artículo de Pablo Belly, que quisieramos compartir con ustedes...


... ¿ Y CON ESO QUE? El saber es un componente importante del conocimiento, pero quedarse con el saber y nada mas, no alcanza, hace falta un paso mas importante aún, y ese paso posterior es el que mas trasciende, el que mas se hace notar al hablar del conocimiento.


Saber como aplicar lo que uno sabe en la acción es lo mas difícil, quizás por este motivo muchas organizaciones no pueden capitalizar en el mercado los conocimientos que poseen los empleados. En la mayor parte de las organizaciones el "asunto" del aprendizaje se lo toma muy en serio, capacitación constante, aprendizaje continuo, aulas virtuales, e-learnning, etc y como si esto fuera poco cuando sale algún tema de management nuevo enseguida lo compran. BASTA DE GASTAR PLATA POR FAVOOOOOOOOOR !!!!!!!.Seguramente el lector no entiende mucho, lo mas probable es que su pensamiento sea a este idiota que le pasa?, por un lado escribe sobre la importancia de los conocimientos y ahora dice lo contrario. Puede ser cierto que sea un idiota, aun no le he demostrado lo contrario, no obstante permítame aclarar este punto.


Una cosa es el SABER QUE y otra cosa es el SABER COMO, con esto quiero decir que el capital intelectual no esta compuesto por el hecho que la empresa tenga bastos conocimientos teóricos sobre un tema especifico (saber que), sino que esta relacionado a la aplicación practica en el mercado de esos conocimientos (saber como).


Antes de tocar de lleno el ámbito de las empresas permítame dar un ejemplo con lo que sucede en los estudiantes universitarios, cuando se gradúan después de cuatro o cinco años de incorporar conocimientos teóricos, creen que son pocos, así que se meten a hacer un posgrado, luego de que pasan mas de dos años estudiando, al terminar se dan cuenta que aun no son suficientes y se embarcan en un master, donde invierten otros años mas, luego se deciden especializar y se embarcan en un doctorado, pero como no es suficiente la especialización, se recontraespecializan en un Phd, hasta que dicen: POR FIN TERMINE !!!! ahora me pongo a trabajar ..... ¿por donde empiezo?, ¿cómo lo hago?.


Coincido en que no puede haber un "saber como" si no hay un "saber que", es decir, no se puede poner en acción aquello que no sabemos o conocemos, pero seamos concretos y digamos que la mayor parte del "saber como" aplicar el conocimiento teorico es culpa en un 50% de la persona, por no ser proactiva y enfrentarse a los posibles fracasos frutos de la carencia de experiencia, y, el otro 50% es responsabilidad de la organización, tutor, institución o cualquier otro agente proveedor de conocimientos por no acompasar al sujeto del dicho al hecho.


Con que las organizaciones dejen de gastar tanta plata en la adquisición de conocimientos me refiero a que pongan el conocimiento en acción, o dicho en otras palabras, que no sea mucho ruido y pocas nueces, es decir que pasen del saber que al saber como.


Para dar este salto hace falta salir de la teoría y pasar al debate, algunas de los puntos detallados a continuación pueden resultar útiles para aquellas organizaciones dispuestas a poner acción, no solo a las palabras, sino a los hechos.


Dar libertad a los teóricos del conocimientos para que puedan demostrar en pequeños grupos la puesta en acción de los conocimientos teóricos. En Xerox, se invita a los clientes para observarlos como utilizan los productos permitiendo al equipo obtener importantes conocimientos relacionados al saber como mejorar la practicidad de la utilización. En Xerox saben que el cliente tiene la razón.


Crear lugares informales para bajar a tierra el "saber que". Considero que es cierto eso de que el hombre es un ser social por naturaleza, de manera que la sociabilizacion del conocimiento se potencia cuando hay lugares específicos dentro o fuera de la empresa donde las personas se juntan y deliran acerca de una idea, en apariencia, alocada. "Este es un espacio donde nos juntamos a charlar informalmente, hoy a la mañana nos juntamos a delirar sobre un proyecto que tenemos que presentar a un cliente" me decía una consultora de Microsoft mientras hacíamos un recorrido por la empresa. (AHHHH !!!, no se que paso con el proyecto éste, pero que se paso de la teoría a la practica estoy seguro).


Sea un apóstol del debate. Si el capital intelectual de la compañía aumenta en proporción directa a la aplicación practica del conocimiento, dé lugar a debatir nuevas ideas en lugar de censurarlas por miedo al fracaso o al rechazo. La historia nos muestra como numerosas personas han tenido que superar estos obstáculos, cuando Charles Darwin publico sus ideas sobre la evolución de las especies, se encontró con que sus colegas en las ciencias le mostraban mas oposición que las autoridades religiosas. Sus teorías desafiaban demasiadas mociones muy arraigadas. Jonas Salk tropezó con la misma piedra con sus radicales innovaciones en inmunologia, y algo similar le paso a Max Planck cuando revoluciono las ciencias físicas. Quizás en su empresa haya un Darwin, un Salk, o un Planck, no digo que le firme un cheque en blanco a los empleados, lo que le estoy diciendo con este párrafo es que brinde el espacio para que las personas pueden expresar el aspecto practico de su teoría, en síntesis, con esto de ser apóstol del debate se trata que los directivos de las empresas pasen de una actitud combativa a una actitud compasiva.


Centrarse en el concepto mas que en los detalles. La excesiva concentración en los detalles separa mucho mas la teoría de la practica, depende de la situación organizacional y el conocimiento teórico que se exponga, pero cuando empezamos a usar el reloj no sabíamos lo que había detrás del vidrio (la maquina), aun hoy muchos no sabemos como esta compuesta, pero sin embargo compramos un reloj porque compramos el concepto, saber la hora. Cuando las empresas se ponen a desarmar el reloj, y no es necesario hacerlo, lo que hacen es poner palos en la rueda a la puesta en practica de ese conocimiento teórico. Los mercados son hiper-veloces y el que no corre vuela, sea de los que vuelan y concéntrese en los conceptos al presentar o comprar un conocimiento teórico de manera que quede lugar para practica y error, practica y error, practica y error, practica y error, practica y error, practica y éxito.


Además de estos puntos, ideas, o como quiera llamarlos, para aumentar el capital intelectual las organizaciones o personas deben tener presentes que todo lo que se puede ver es lo que cuenta, así como el amor se demuestra en las acciones para con el ser amado, el conocimiento se evidencia y vale en la practica, no en la teoría.


Así que ponga el SABER QUE en acción y disfrute, porque el conocimiento es algo que no se gasta con el uso, por el contrario, aumenta el valor.

lunes, 9 de marzo de 2009

How to lead when you are not the Boss



by Christina Bielaszka-DuVernay


Real leadership is never a matter of mere formal authority. Leaders are effective when other people acknowledge them as such--by listening seriously to their ideas, valuing and following their suggestions for action, and turning to them for advice.

Opportunities to lead aren't limited to times when you have formal authority over a particular team or venture. When you step forward and demonstrate leadership, you will contribute value to the project or enterprise--and strengthen your leadership skills.

In their book Lateral Leadership: Getting Things Done When You're Not the Boss (2nd ed., Profile Books, 2004), Harvard negotiation specialist Roger Fisher and coauthor Alan Sharp lay out a useful five-step method for leading when you are not formally in charge. Its steps can be applied to virtually any project you're involved in or team or meeting you participate in.

1. Establish goalsPeople accomplish the most when they have a clear set of objectives. It follows that any group's first order of business is to write down exactly what it hopes to achieve. The person who asks the question "Can we start by clarifying our goals here?"--and who then assumes the lead in discussing and drafting those goals--is automatically taking a leadership role, whatever his or her position.



2. Think systematically Observe your next meeting: people typically plunge right into the topic at hand and start arguing over what to do. Effective leaders, by contrast, learn to think systematically--that is, they gather and lay out the necessary data, analyze the causes of the situation, and propose actions based on this analysis. In a group, leaders help keep participants focused by asking appropriate questions. Do we have the information we need to analyze this situation? Can we focus on figuring out the causes of the problem we're trying to solve?


3. Learn from experience--while it's happeningTeams often plow ahead on a project, then conduct a review at the end to figure out what they learned. But it's more effective for teams (or individuals) to learn as they go along.
Anyone who prompts the group to engage in regular minireviews and learn from them is playing a de facto leadership role. Why is this ongoing process more effective than an after-action review? The events are fresh in everyone's mind. And the team can use what they learn from each minireview to make needed adjustments to their work processes or their goals.


4. Engage othersA high-performing team engages the efforts of every member, and effective team leaders seek out the best fit possible between members' interests and the tasks that need doing. Suggest writing down a list of chores and matching them up with individuals or subgroups. If no one wants a particular task, brainstorm ways to make that task more interesting or challenging. Help draw out the group's quieter members so that everyone feels a part of the overall project.


5. Provide feedbackIf you're not the boss, what kind of feedback can you provide? One thing that's always valued is simple appreciation--"I thought you did a great job in there." Sometimes, too, you'll be in a position to help people improve their performance through coaching. Effective coaches ask a lot of questions: "How did you feel you did on this part of the project?" They recognize that people may try hard and fail anyway: "What made it hard to accomplish your part of the task?" They offer thoughtful suggestions for improvement, being careful to explain the observation and reasoning that lie behind them.

Video: Paul Krugman on the Economy at HBS

Paul Krugman - economics professor at Princeton, New York Times columnist, and now the winner of the Nobel Prize in economics -- visited Harvard Business Review's offices on February 9th.

Krugman is also an HBR author. Of particular note is his 1996 article, A Country Is Not a Company (free until March 13), which carefully outlines the significant distinction between skill at running a business and skill at understanding the economy.

Krugman came to the HBR offices to talk about his new book, The Return of Depression Economics, and the economy in general.

In the video clips below, Krugman offers opinions on why the stimulus package is not big enough (and why it needs to be bigger); who bears the most blame for the economic crisis; what he thinks of Henry "Hank" Paulson's performance; and what a "Krugman Plan" might look like.

Why the stimulus package needs to be bigger if it's going to work.




Next videos at : http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/hbreditors/2009/02/video_paul_krugman_on_the_econ.html

viernes, 6 de marzo de 2009

Propuesta solucion a la crisis: aplicar la Teoria de la FRUGALIDAD


Se que si ingresaste al blog, fue porque eres una persona inquieta, que no se queda con leer algo que no este argumentado, cosa que me satisface. Ahora bien, aunque la palabra FRUGAL es sinonimo de mesura (por ejemplo, medirse en gastos), la teoria de la frugalidad es todo lo contrario, pues esta lo que dice es que en tiempos de crisis lo que se debe es aumentar el consumo, pero aun te debes seguir preguntando, por que??

Simple, veamoslo al reves:

si la gente no consume, significa que las empresas no venden
si las empresas no venden, no perciben ni ingresos y mucho menos ganacias
si las empresas no perciben ingresos, deben despedir o cargarse al personal
si despiden al personal, se traduce en PARO o desempleo.

Ahora veamoslo al derecho:

Si la gente consume, las empresas venden
si las empresas venden, perciben ingresos y ganancias
si las empresas perciben ingresos y ganancias, NO despiden ni se cargan a la gente
si las empresas no despiden a la gente, NO HAY PARO o desempleo.


Ahora... espero que con lo anterior haya resuelto tu curiosidad.



Hasta la proxima...

domingo, 1 de marzo de 2009

"Head in, hands on": Ram Charan on How to Lead Now

by Christina Bielaszka-DuVernay


Renowned business adviser Ram Charan's latest book is Leadership in the Era of Economic Uncertainty: The New Rules for Getting the Right Things Done in Difficult Times (McGraw-Hill, 2008). He recently spoke with Christina Bielaszka-DuVernay, a HarvardBusiness.org editor, about the challenges — and opportunities — this downturn presents to companies and their leaders. In this edited record of their conversation, Charan gives leaders at all levels advice on guiding their organizations and people through this crisis and coming out stronger on the other side.

CBD: What's most important for leaders — not just CEOs and senior executives but leaders throughout the ranks — to focus on right now?

RC: In these times more than other times, first and foremost is demonstrating personal integrity and maintaining your personal credibility. They are so important in tough times, yet many leaders lose their integrity and destroy their credibility by giving into the temptation to cut corners when they have to do unpleasant tasks like downsizing. For example, a business-unit head, instead of being transparent about why he needs to cut 10 jobs, gives a partial truth or makes an excuse. That's a way of cutting corners, and it's destructive. In the Google era, people will find out the truth and that leader will lose credibility, making his job even more difficult.


Tell people the truth. Gather information — from customers, from your customer-facing employees, from sources outside the firm. Talk to employees throughout the company; listen to their viewpoints and engage them. When you have a firm picture of reality, share it. Tell people the reality — if the company doesn't take action now and cut some jobs, even more good people will lose jobs later. In this environment, the entire company could fail as a result of a leader failing to make hard decisions when they're needed.


If you have to make layoffs, make them in a fair, open way. Be frank; explain what's happening on the outside and why layoffs are necessary to protect good people and good jobs.


Authenticity is always important but now it's absolutely critical. Leaders, wherever they sit in the organization, have to demonstrate rock-solid integrity, honesty, and the ability to confront reality. The way to inspire courage and optimism in your employees is by mapping a credible path forward. If you soft-pedal bad news, they won't trust you. Worse, they'll miss the urgency of the situation and won't follow you.


In your book you advise leaders to practice "management intensity." What is this and why is it so important now?


I define management intensity as a deep immersion in the business's operational details and the day-to-day competitive climate the business is facing, along with hands-on involvement and follow-through.


It's so important now because of the accelerating speed at which things are changing. Surviving a volatile environment requires frequent operational adjustments. You hear every day about new layoffs and downward projections. Keeping up with news like that and tracking its effects is crucial, because a cut today will initiate cuts elsewhere tomorrow. It's not enough to sit in your office and read reports and issue directives. You've got to know what's happening daily, and adjust plans and processes accordingly.


Big-picture strategic thinking is still important, but it must take a back seat to this operational immersion — leaders need to be involved and visible, and communicating all the time. As I explain in the book, your guiding principle should be this: Head in, hands on. Only in this way will you be able to anticipate what's coming next and respond quickly and appropriately.
Does management intensity place a greater emphasis on execution than what's called for in more flush times?


Yes — management intensity calls for a sharper and more frequent focus on execution. The DuPont story I tell in my book is a good example of what I mean. When Chad Holliday [then DuPont's CEO; now its chairman] determined that the global banking crisis had spread beyond the financial sector and could seriously affect his company, he called a meeting of DuPont's crisis teams. Over four days, they put together a plan to deal with the growing economic downturn. Conserving cash was the top priority.


Within two weeks, every one of DuPont's 60,000 employees had had a face-to-face meeting with a manager who explained the plan for keeping DuPont viable. Each employee was asked to name three things he could do immediately to save money and conserve cash. Then a few days later, the company polled employees to assess their understanding of the crisis, their psychological response to it, and their follow-through on conserving cash.


After this first round of communication with DuPont employees, you report in your book, Holliday had the sense that people hadn't grasped the urgency of the situation. You quote him as saying that "maybe we were too good at giving [employees] the reassurance and confidence that we could come through this." What balance should leaders strike right now between realism and optimism?


Realism is not negotiable. It's absolutely essential to anyone who leads. You need to have a clear picture of how bad things are and how bad things could get, then put that reality in front of people.


Realism also includes determining under what conditions the business will improve, and communicating those scenarios. That's optimism grounded in solid realism.
People through the centuries have gone through some very difficult times. Those who succeeded despite challenging conditions did so because they were tough and tenacious. You have tough and tenacious people working for you; engage them by putting the hard issues right in front of them. They will be motivated to overcome the challenges.


Isn't there a danger that people will become demoralized by the enormity of the challenges? How does a leader prevent that from happening?


Give them the problems in bite sizes. Put a challenge in front of them that's specific and concrete enough to deal with. For instance, if your competitor has a 20% win ratio, challenge them to get 30%. Even though the total market is declining, even though your company's revenues will be smaller, you and your employees still have a chance to compete and to beat somebody.
These are anxious times. How should leaders manage their own emotions?


Actually, in a crisis most leaders tend to be too optimistic rather than the contrary. They overestimate how well their company will fare because they want to believe everything will turn out well. This misplaced optimism allows them to think that they don't have to make painful decisions or take drastic action.


To guard against this, I advise all leaders to map out worst-case scenarios. If you deliberately plan for the worst, you'll probably encounter something less dire and come out ahead when it's all over.


In your book you say that surviving this downturn requires intense coordination across the company. What can the CEO do to pull down silos and foster companywide coordination? What can midlevel leaders do?


Any leader at any level can figure out what key decisions must be made and what coordination is required to implement them. Say your unit aims to launch a new product by July. You know what decisions you will have to make around that goal. So move swiftly to get the best information you can, then make the best decisions you can.You know there will be three or four silos involved. Check in with people from those areas frequently, asking questions and exploring issues with an open, informal tone. Remind them of your shared purpose: to win with customers. Human beings like to win, and in companies, no one wins alone.


It might help to think that the situation you and your colleagues face is akin to a basketball game. Players make judgments constantly about the game as it's in progress, instinctively passing the ball to a teammate to counter the defense, without worrying about who's going to get the credit. Basketball is a sport of speed, flexibility, and synchronization. The same qualities are demanded of cross-functional teams in this recession. What department or function teammates come from doesn't matter; what matters is that they're united against the competition.
You teach a class at Wharton for high potentials. What's your advice to high potentials in this downturn?


If you're a high potential, act like one and keep building your capabilities; this recession doesn't have to slow you down. In fact, it offers you opportunities that normal times don't. Wherever you work, it's likely that there is a shortage of really talented, motivated people with the flexibility and resilience to weather these tough times. So step forward and get noticed. Get on cross-functional teams. Learn and lead. Build social networks. Set benchmarks for yourself — use the next two years to double your capacity and triple your capabilities.
What will the best companies do during this recession?


They'll get ahead the curve and conserve their cash. They'll take out frills and focus on the core. And then they'll think of how the market will have changed in two or three years and what innovation they will need to have done to compete successfully, and they'll do that innovation now.

Four Ways to Improve Your Team's Performance

Wednesday February 11, 2009 by Daisy Wademan Dowling -Harvard Business Publishing-

Face it: 2009 is going to be your toughest year yet. Budgets are lower, expectations are higher, and you're under pressure to deliver the goods -- no mistakes or hiccups allowed. That's a tall order even if you've got a seasoned team of highly motivated A+ performers.

But what if you don't? What if, like most managers, you're dealing with a strong but not stellar group, players of varying drive and skill, and a severely limited ability to bring in fresh talent? A recent New York Times article demonstrates how the right approach to coaching your team can let you achieve spectacular performance -- no matter what the environment.

The article describes Tom Donnelly, the men's track and field coach for the past 34 years at Haverford College, a Quaker school with fewer than 1,200 students. Despite the school's tiny enrollment, noncompetitive philosophy, and lack of athletic scholarships, Donnelly has managed to produce 113 All-Americans and 24 individual N.C.A.A. champions -- a jaw-dropping record for a school of any size or budget. He's also sent runners to each of the past four Olympic trials, and won more "Coach of the Year" awards than anyone can seem to count. (His team boasts the highest average GPA of any Division III track team, too.) Donnelly's superb, sustained results are the kind every manager dreams of.

And according to the Coach himself, they're the kind of results any manager can shoot for -- and attain. The secrets to getting your team out front, he says, are as follows:

1. Spend as much time with the slowest runner as with the fastest. To improve a team's performance, focus on its weakest members. As long as a team member is working hard, he or she deserves your attentive, careful coaching.

2. Take away performance pressure by adding perspective -- and fun. Donnelly's pep talks are laced with trivia, history, and jokes. He readily acknowledges that running track is not the only important thing in his athletes' lives. "All you have to do" he says, "is try your very best. Then you cannot lose."

3. Accept inevitable setbacks -- and move past them quickly. The times when other teams win? Donnelly and his runners spend no time sulking or pointing fingers. "We acknowledge the other team's accomplishment and we recover."

4. Let the team's performance be its own reward. The team's trophies and award certificates go up in Donnelly's office. His own coaching awards go in the trash. They get in the way, Donnelly claims, of doing his job -- teaching other people how to succeed.

Imagine your workplace being managed by Coach Donnelly. Sound like one where you would be motivated, even in this awful year, to achieve? (Me too.)

Now imagine being Coach Donnelly -- and watching your runners lap the field.

What other ideas do you have for spurring your team's performance in this challenging economy?